|










| |
Self Defense and Guns
| Introduction
From about 1993 to
1995 I was a subscriber of the Indianapolis News. From this came a
new hobby: writing "Letters to Editor" to refute what I felt
were a number of ill-considered statements about firearms and
crime. Over this two-year (or so) period I sent thirty such
letters to the News, fourteen of which were published. I recently
grabbed a number of sections from those letters, wrote a few new bits,
and tossed them all into a bowl. Here's what came out. |
| The Religious Side
of Self Defense
We all have a
God-given right to keep and bear arms in order to protect ourselves and
our families from criminal attack. The Bible tells us that we have
not only the right, but also the duty to keep and bear
defensive arms, and to defend ourselves and other known innocents
against criminal attack, even if said defense be lethal to the
attacker. (1 Timothy 5:8, Luke 22:36, 1 Samuel 13:19, Exodus
22:2.) Most folks are not aware that many Bible scholars agree
that in the original Hebrew, the meaning of Exodus 20:13 is not
"Thou Shalt Not Kill" as it is written in english
Bibles. The correct meaning is "Thou Shalt Not Murder".
"The greatest
gift that God bestows upon each of us is the gift of life. To fail
to defend our life against a criminal attack devalues God's most
precious gift and dishonors God." (Author unknown.) |
| Gun Problem or
People Problem?
In the United States
firearms are employed in the commission of about 55% of all
murders. Are the remaining 45% of murder victims any less
dead? If guns are "the problem" as many claim, why
are there so many murders by knife, bludgeon, fire, or hands and
feet? In the "West Side Story" era the drive-by with
chains and bricks was just as lethal as today's drive-by shooting.
Irrespective of the
weapon he chooses, a person with malicious intent can maim or kill as
many people as he wants, so long as no one is willing and able to stop
him. To stop even an unarmed attacker requires more resolve and
muscle than most of us possess. A knife is a weapon of attack
which is readily available to anyone and which may be employed quickly
and in near silence (and without the need for reloading). A person
with even highly advanced defensive tactics training would be lucky to
survive an attempt to stop a knife attack either by hand or armed with
only a contact weapon (such as a knife, nightstick, baseball bat,
etc). Only with a gun can one stop an armed attacker without
jeopardizing his own safety. |
| Statistics
A study by Gary
Kleck, Ph.D. Of Florida State University concluded that as many as two
and one-half million citizens lawfully use firearms for self-defense
annually, three-fourths of whom use handguns, resulting in the saving of
as many as 400,000 lives. Using government crime statistics and
Kleck's study, we find that a gun is:
 | 50 times more
likely to be used for defense than to be used in a suicide |
 | 50 times more
than to likely to be used for defense then to be used to commit a
homicide |
 | 535 times more
likely to be used for defense than to accidentally kill someone. |
A more recent study
by John R. Lott, Jr. and David B. Mustard of the University of Chicago
concluded that allowing honest citizens to carry concealed handguns
deters violent crimes to the extent that if those states without right
to carry provisions in 1992 had adopted same, at least 1,570 murders,
4,177 rapes, and over 60,000 aggravated assaults would have been
avoided. The estimated annual gain in 1992 from allowing
concealed handguns was estimated to be over $6.214 billion.
States in which
citizens have the right to carry concealed firearms have a 24% lower
total violent crime rate, 19% lower homicide rate, 19% lower aggravated
assault rate, and a 39% lower robbery rate than other states.
Clearly, states and cities who's citizens are being
"protected" by anti-gun laws are in actuality turning people
into defenseless prey for criminals, who buy black- market guns as
easily as one can buy illegal drugs. The right to keep and bear
arms facilitates the saving of many lives. Gun laws facilitate
criminal activity.
Less than 0.4% of
the 200 million guns in the U.S. are ever used in crimes.
Civilians legally capture 2 to 3 times, and lawfully kill 5 to 6 times
more violent criminals than do the police. In the last few years a
number of states and cities have reformed their gun laws and started
allowing law-abiding citizens to carry concealed handguns as we Hoosiers
may do. There have been no increases in accidental or
unjustified shootings, and in most every locale the rate of violent
crime has decreased. In Florida for instance, 221,443 carry
licenses were issued between October of 1987 and April 30 of
1994. There was no significant rise in firearms accidents,
and only 0.008% of licensees have been charged with handgun crimes. |
| Yesterday and Today
The writers of our
Constitution believed that the man who would forfeit his freedom in
exchange for security would have neither. We would seem to
be quickly headed in that direction.
These men understood
that those who would do harm to others will use whatever means are
available. They knew that the people must be able to defend
themselves, be it from criminal assault, foreign invasion, or, as in the
1700s, a government intent on turning it's citizens into unarmed
subjects. This is why the Second Amendment was included in the
Constitution, second in importance only to the right of free
speech. (I must note here that the Constitutions of the United
States and the State of Indiana do not grant the right to keep
and bear arms or any other right. They merely enumerate some of
those God-given rights that are not to be infringed by the government or
any other power).
Our founding fathers
likely never imagined our current violent age. An era in which
those who commit violent acts against others would not suffer meaningful
punishment, but would instead merely do a short stint in a prison
"crime school" before being set free to once again prey upon
the innocent. Our founders would not have believed that someday
people would no longer take responsibility for their own well-being, but
would instead rely upon a force of policemen to "keep them
safe", which the police cannot do and indeed are not legally bound
to do. Cops do not carry guns so the rest of us don't have
to. Like anyone else they carry firearms for defense against
criminals, most of whom have likely victimized many an unarmed citizen
before finally being stopped. In order for even the very best of
police departments to prevent or halt any meaningful percentage of our
violent crimes, we would likely need a cop in every house, car, and
business. No thank you!
Many call the right
to carry firearms an "Old West" mentality. These folks
are not aware that the murder rate in the "Wild West" was
lower than it is now. Since the west became "civilized"
and lesser numbers of citizens have chosen to bear arms, a greater
number of criminals have taken up arms with which to prey upon the
innocent. |
| What should you
do?
Firearms are not for
everyone. In order to save oneself or another known innocent from
death or grave bodily harm, one may have to use his gun to take the life
of another human being. The emotional repercussions are not
to be taken lightly. They are however widely understood, and may
to some extent be avoided by mind-set conditioning
beforehand. With post-event counseling it is found that
those who have killed in self-defense often suffer less permanent
emotional trauma than those who have survived a violent attack that they
were unable to repel.
Educate yourself on
the issue. Check out the NRA
Facts Sheet page. Take an NRA firearms safety course,
NRA basic firearms training course, or private-lesson firearms training
(in central Indiana call Tactical Training Associates' Tony Gregory @
317-841-4101). Read "The Truth about Self Protection"
and "In the Gravest Extreme: The Role of the Firearm in Personal
Protection" by Massad
F. Ayoob. Take one of Ayoob's Lethal Force Institute training
courses. (I feel that if everyone were required to take his LFI I
course, all of this anti-gun silliness would grind to a halt.
There's some very sobering stuff in there. But it's a lot of
serious fun as well.)
After researching
the subject and getting some training, if you are not resolute in your
belief that you could do whatever was necessary to protect yourself from
a violent attack, then a firearm is likely not for you. You should
at least read the aforementioned book "The Truth about Personal
Protection", and take the NRA "Refuse to be a Victim"
course (taught country-wide by NRA certified instructors).
|
| Links of Interest
Constitution
of the United States
Gun Owners of
America
Jews for the Preservation
of Firearms Ownership
Lethal Force
Institute/Police Bookshelf
Lott/Mustard
Gun Control Study
National Rifle Association
Second Amendment
Foundation
Second Amendment
Sisters
Women Against Gun Control |

|